AI Legal Chatbot
Documents
Cases
Laws
Law Firms
Add Law Firm
LPMS
Quizzes
Login
Join
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission v Stephen Kibet Ngeno [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Court
Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
S. ole Kantai, J.A.
Judgment Date
October 23, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
2
Case Summary
Full Judgment
Case Brief: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission v Stephen Kibet Ngeno [2020] eKLR
1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission v. Stephen Kibet Ngeno
- Case Number: Civil Application No. 43 of 2019
- Court: Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Date Delivered: 23rd October 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): S. ole Kantai, J.A.
- Country: Kenya
2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issue presented to the court was whether to grant an extension of time for the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to file a notice of appeal against the judgment of the Employment and Labour Relations Court, which ordered the reinstatement of Stephen Kibet Ngeno and payment of damages.
3. Facts of the Case:
The applicant, the IEBC, was dissatisfied with a judgment delivered by Njagi Marete, J., of the Employment and Labour Relations Court on 1st February 2019. This judgment involved issues of reinstatement, withheld salary, notice pay, and damages, ordering the respondent, Stephen Kibet Ngeno, to be reinstated to his position and compensated accordingly. The notice of judgment was served on the same day, but the applicant's legal team, based in Nairobi, could not attend the court in Kericho. They did not receive a copy of the judgment until 1st March 2019, which was after the deadline for filing a notice of appeal.
4. Procedural History:
The application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal was made under Section 3A of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act and relevant rules of the Court. The applicant argued that the delay was due to circumstances beyond their control, including the timing of the judgment delivery and the late receipt of the judgment document. The motion was dated 2nd August 2019, and the court had to consider the length and reasons for the delay, the likelihood of success of the appeal, and potential prejudice to the respondent.
5. Analysis:
- Rules: The court considered the principles established in Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Wangari Mwangi [1999] 2 EA 233, which outline the discretionary nature of extending time for appeals. The factors include the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, chances of success of the appeal, and the degree of prejudice to the respondent.
- Case Law: The court referenced the aforementioned case, emphasizing that extensions are granted based on the circumstances of each case. The applicant argued that their appeal was of great public interest, touching on stay orders from a related case (County Government of Embu & Others v. IEBC & Others).
- Application: The court found that the applicant's reasons for the delay were valid, as the judgment was only made known to them on 1st March 2019. The court concluded that the length of the delay was not excessive and that the applicant should be granted the opportunity to appeal, given the implications of the lower court's ruling on public interest.
6. Conclusion:
The Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the applicant, granting an extension of time to file a notice of appeal. The applicant was ordered to file the notice within 14 days and the record of appeal within 30 days thereafter. The decision underscored the importance of allowing parties the opportunity to appeal significant rulings, particularly in matters of public interest.
7. Dissent:
There were no dissenting opinions noted in the ruling.
8. Summary:
The Court of Appeal granted the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against a judgment ordering the reinstatement of an employee and payment of damages. This case highlights the court's discretion in extending appeal timelines, particularly when delays are due to factors beyond a party's control, and reinforces the significance of addressing public interest issues in employment law.
Document Summary
Below is the summary preview of this document.
This is the end of the summary preview.
📢 Share this document with your network
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Related Documents
Justine Ng’ang’a Ngaruiya v Peter Gitau Njugi & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Republic v Nairobi County Government & another; Backlite Limited (Interested Party), Exparte Consumer Link Communications Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Wilson Macharia Kabugi v Equity Bank Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Captain Motorcycle Manufacturing Co Ltd v James Maxwell Okiri Mochache & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Yussuf Aden Mohamed v Osman Aden Salat & 3 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Hannington Kyengo Munyao & 7 others v Benard Nguyo & 9 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Ikuuni Hotel Ltd v Serah Nundu Nthaku [2020] eKLR Case Summary
In re Adoption AW (Baby) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Gulf African Bank Limited v Tejprakash Sehmi & 2 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kiura Charles Mucira v Rose Muroko [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Maxwell Otieno Odongo v Philip Juma Okoth & 4 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Abdi Dubow Koriow v Hassan Nassip Jelle & 3 others [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kenya County Government Workers Union v County Government of Tana River & another [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Kenya Red Cross Society v Mbondo Katheke Mwania [2020] eKLR Case Summary
Njuca Consolidated Company Ltd v George Otieno [2020] eKLR Case Summary
China Zhongxing Construction Company Ltd v Eden Development Limited (K) [2020] eKLR Case Summary
View all summaries